Thursday, May 24, 2012

Why reinvent the wheel?

Aren’t We All Trying To Do the Same Thing? Four Alberta Post-Secondary Institutions Collaborating to Create an Information Literacy Assessment Tool
Presented by: Nancy Goebel, University of Alberta; Jessica Knoch, Grant MacEwan University; Michelle Edwards Thomson, Red Deer College and Rebekah Willson from Mount Royal University

This was my frst chance to see clickers in action within a classroom activity as they were utilized throughout the session!  It was very cool to see live polling and results generated by the audience.
Context:  
  • Increasing emphasis on accountability and learning outcomes
  • Increasing calls for assessment
  • Lack of assessment tools that meet needs
  • What is that we want to do in terms of assessment and how can we collaborate as a group on this topic 
Goals:

  • Create shared vision of IL
  • Create an assessment tool
  • Focus on lower level undergraduate students
  • How we can benefit from this collaboration?
    • Shared vision through the dissection of the ACRL standards
    • Learn from each other, value differing perspectives
  • How can our institutions benefit from this collaboration?
    • Shared solution to the problem of assessment
    • Shared implementation costs - created a low cost tool, think tank between 4 different institutions
    • Has already produced results and individual results are comparable to these other institutions
Post-test assessment which were mapped to ACRL performance indicators, developed to address a wide variety of IL skills that is delivered by librarians
• 2 demographic questions
• 17 multi-choice summary questions
• 2 open-ended feedback questions

Feedback from students:
• Citation
Evaluation (key area of focus)
• Access
• Need to time to process info - so much information to take in one session, yet I know where to go for help

Future Directions:
• Validate survey questions
• Expand question bank
• Develop a process for rolling the assessment tool out to other libraries
• Need to focus on the research process and not so much on the tool itself

No comments:

Post a Comment