Wednesday, April 8, 2020

Social Media


Social Media And Copyright Dr. Hayleigh Bosher
The mandate of social media is sharing content, either individual or third party content.  Huge profits are made by Twitter, Facebook and Instagram for example.  They have the resources to take on some of the expense of protecting content, it is not just a generous gift to all of us.  It is very important to keep an eye on what these are companies are up to.  We are encouraged to share, the more we share, the more money they make, more benefit to the platform.

Yet the purpose of copyright is the creation and dissemination of culture, knowledge and information which achieved through the protection of who can copy and how much. 

Did you read the terms of use?  Probably not.  You may think that it is a generous gift from the internet - no not really... Instagram for example, allows you to keep copyright, but you grant them non-exclusive, transferable, sub-licensable, royalty-free worldwide access/use of your content.  More troubling, the licence survives even if you stop using the platform feature.  Perpetual terms are similar for other platforms.

So what does it mean... you grant them everything...
If the institution owns your IP through the course of employment, and we upload that content to social media, we could be in breach of institutional policy.

Social media is becoming very common for classroom use so copyright professionals, others, need to update institutional policies to protect faculty.  Or at the very least make sure that faculty are aware of the terms of use from these companies.

More examples: 
  • Instagram is selling to AI for facial recognition software - so you can never really get your stuff back
  • YouTube - your royalties comes from advertising not from licensing - isn’t that a good mechanism because the purpose of copyright is to ensure a revenue stream for the creator
  • Instagram - you warrant that they own the content that they post or it does not infringe.
Trend of platforms going after the every day user for infringing copyright
What constitutes skill, labour and effort?  Do we need to raise the bar when there is an APP to create a song, produce a photograph?  Especially when compared to traditional views on creation (skilled producer to create a song)

Two camps of educators... either don’t know and don’t care, just do what they want vs. so scared that they don’t use anything.

There are companies and software searching the internet for opportunities to sue the every day users of social media.  It is in their best interest and they can also afford to do so.  

We need more people to push the boundaries on copyright limitations.

No comments:

Post a Comment