Showing posts with label Technology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Technology. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 12, 2022

PPT for the win!

I love when you think you know everything there is to know about something and you walk away with several things that you learned. 

This happened to me while I was watching a video for class on elements of graphic design. The three items that were new to me are: 

  • Use the eyedropper option under the home menu, theme colours. You can use this option to match colours that you find on the web. This is an ideal for covering items that you do not want such as logos on an image.  This option will allow you to match to the background as well.
  • Layers - arrange layers instead of bring to the front, etc. as this option is more precise
  • Use https://accessibleweb.com/color-contrast-checker/ to check colour contrast

Tuesday, May 5, 2020

Resources

The third module in the Instructional Design course from Library Juice Academy covered the creation of learning outcomes and the use of supplemental materials.  

Learning materials fall into several categories:


  • The traditional commercially published textbook model.  Many publishers are making their packages more lucrative by including learning objects, such as PPT, test banks, instructional videos, etc.  These additional items leave me wondering if they take teaching out of instruction and out of the institution.  The instruction materials covered by the publisher rely on use of the textbook from start to finish.  The instructor becoming dependent on what is available from the publisher and at the will of updates/edits/adaptations that are made by said company.
  • Library resources is a viable alternative, removing many copyright restrictions.  Library resources can be embedded in class materials through a permalink.  When an instructor used a permalink to share content, the library can capture accurate usage statistics.  Also, providing references increases awareness of this type of information and how it can be used as search clues for retrieving content.
  • OER is another option that is gaining traction in post-secondary institutions.  OER allows for more flexibility and versatility of instruction, as the instructor can pick and choose what works for them and their teaching activities. 

This module included some basic information about accessibility: 

  • Visual - screen readers, considerations of font and colour variances 
  • Hearing - save chat transcript, consideration synchronous vs. asynchronous courses and how that might effective the needs of your students.  Ask yourself, what arrangements need to be made in advance?  
A good source for further information on this topic is: https://webaim.org.  This is a very important topic and I encourage you to delve deeper into it.   

Thursday, April 23, 2020

Double Click for the Win!

Little known feature in the Microsoft suite of products - if you double click on the format painter in the ribbon, you can change the format of more than one item, just keep selecting the desired text to change.  Escape or double click again once you are done making the edits.  Truly a game changer.

Also discovered yesterday that Zoom has an enhance your appearance option!  Hilarious!  Found in the options beside video in the bottom left hand corner of the meeting screen.  Appears as an option.  Softens the lighting.  Years quickly vanished.  Love it!  My new favourite feature.


Friday, October 13, 2017

Asynchronous Learning, Lectures and PowerPoint

Advantages and Disadvantages of Asynchronous Learning

The main advantage of asynchronous learning is that the learner can participate in their studies at a time that is convenient for them.  My graduate degree was 100% online, I worked, had young children and did my homework in the evening after everyone was in bed, so I believe that this is a true advantage of this form of learning.  According to Hughes (2014), learners have the ability to learn at their own pace and can review the classroom materials as often as necessary in an asynchronous environment.  While I can attest to the ability to review materials at my leisure, the pace of the class is dictated by the assignments that are due and the overall course content.  Although you can leave things to the last possible minute, the learner cannot really control the overall pace of the class.  That is probably a good thing, as many of us are not self-directed enough to complete tasks that have no assigned due date.  Some disadvantages of asynchronous learning include detachment from your classmates and potential feelings of isolation.  I think humans are social creatures and enjoy the opportunities to discuss topics and learn from their colleagues.  Without an active discussion board, those opportunities would not exist.  Another disadvantage that I would note is that the class time is not limited to a typical class length.  My professors at graduate school would often assign as much content as they wanted within the week.  Responding to discussion boards took hours of my time, much longer than a 3-hour lecture.  And I was forced to contribute (good and bad thing).  In a face-to-face (f2f) lecture, if I didn’t feel like contributing, I could avoid making eye contact.

Is 'Lecture' a Bad Word?

The term lecture has become a catchall phrase that can mean anything from the traditional ‘sage on the stage’ all the way to a modern view encompassing the ‘guide on the side’ methodology of instruction.  Although the term tends to have a negative connotation, I think of it as the concept of the standard class time allotment.  I believe that online classes are more likely to fall prey to ‘traditional lecture format’ than any class that I have attended f2f in recent years.  In my experience, f2f classes, more often than not, contain a participatory element.  There are group activities, discussions, hands-on experiences and so much more.  I will agree with Bates (2015) that the more traditional format of a lecture where the expert talks and the participants listen is likely dying out.  But teachers and learners who engage in critical thinking and active learning are the future.  Teachers help students understand materials.  They synthesize huge amounts of knowledge into manageable chunks.  Learning builds on a solid foundation and instruction is scaffolded.  
My library instruction sessions are all offered in a f2f learning environment.  In my opinion, my classes are most successful when I have the opportunity to include plenty of active learning techniques, such as: demos, group and solo reflective exercises, quizzes, polling, etc. Perhaps because these are the classes that I enjoy teaching the most, these are the classes where I feel the students are most engaged in my instruction.

Is PowerPoint Evil?

In my Learning Technologies class we were asked to watch a TEDtalk and then comment on the topic covered.  The Phillips TEDtalk is highly entertaining and educational.  He discusses our use of PowerPoint software and how it is done well and not so well.  He states that PPTs can help to illustrate a point, prompt the presenter, provides an overview of the materials covered, notes key points and generally complements the presenter and the information that is being presented. I appreciated the comment made at the end of his talk, when he said that your PPT should not distract from you, because ultimately you are the presentation!  The problem is that most people don’t create successful PPTs.  They load the slides with content, the text is hard to read (size, colour, amount), there is little contrast on the slides and the information is quickly forgotten.  Also in the TEDtalk, I liked how he suggested that the presenter should have the greatest contrast in order to draw the audience’s attention to them.  
Bates, A. W. (2015).  Teaching in a digital age [Open Textbook].  Retrieved from https://opentextbc.ca/teachinginadigitalage/
Hughes, A. (2014). Comparing asynchronous and synchronous learning [Webpage].  Retrieved from  https://www.learningsolutionsmag.com/articles/1577/comparing-asynchronous-and-synchronous-learning
Phillips, D.J.P. (2014). How to avoid death by PowerPoint [Video file].  Retrieved from https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Iwpi1Lm6dFo

Thursday, May 16, 2013

Technology + Accessibility = Engagement

I recently presented at a conference on distributed learning.  Before my session started I was handed a microphone (which I typically prefer not to use) while the computer technician began loading software onto the presenter's computer and running a sound check.  I had no idea what they were doing and was given no insight into why it was happening.  I later surmised that an individual in the audience was hearing impaired and the technology that they were utilizing was translating my spoken words into text so that the individual could participate in the presentation.  Very cool, just wished that they had explained it to me!

I then attended a workshop at the same conference in which this individual was a speaker.  Big a-ha moment here for me!  The presenter spoke about making accommodation in universal design for learning thus providing multiple means of representation, expression and engagement for the students.  Instructors already (hopefully?) make accommodations for different learning styles; making a class universally accessible really is no different. 

but how?  some possibilities are: (*caveat - none of these guarantee 100% accessibility)
  • by incorporating clickers into classroom
  • by utilizing collaborative note-taking such as class created lecture notes via Google docs
  • by using Easy Chirp instead of Twitter which has a cleaner interface
  • by texting
  • by podcasting
  • by using speech recognition software
but really by simply being aware (*caveat - well maybe this one!). 

Want to take a small step in that direction, start by describing the steps that you are taking if you are demonstrating your library web page or other online resource.  It will help everyone in your class understand the information a bit better.  A point that was reiterated by my recent peer evaluation, which suggested that I needed to be more descriptive of the steps that I was taking.

Friday, June 24, 2011

Terrified of technology - notes from a conference presentation

The final session that I attended at WILU was entitled "Mobile Technology and Learning: Information Literacy Beyond the Classroom", presented by Robin Canuel and Chad Crichton.

The presentation began with a thought provoking discussion on determining the needs of the end users which is something that we are very concerned with in libraries. Their argument - does Steve Jobs ask us what we want or does he tell us what we need?

They then briefly demonstrated types of technology that could be incorporated into the library such as Google Goggles, GPS and QR codes.

The next portion of their presentation focused on the challenges of utilizing technology which they identified as:
- expertise
- cost
- competing priorities
- perception of librarians as perhaps technology illiterate
- licensed vs. owned content (DRM)
- speed
- coverage

The opportunities:
- engage students with the use of compelling technology
- harness the librarian's expertise (I am not sure in which context I wrote this comment down - but I like it - so I am leaving it!)
- the ability to re-emphasis traditional information literacy skills

They stated by the end of their presentation, members of the audience who didn't already own a smart phone would be inticed to run out and buy one. Hmmm... I don't own a smart phone, I found their presentation compelling, but I am not sure if I am ready to make that leap just yet!

* As a side note: I played whirly word on my friends' iPhone for several hours last weekend. That game is only available for iPhones - now I feel the need to have a smart phone!!!

** I love their idea of QR codes. I think I am going to add them to the stacks where I work and see what happens.